Hand-Clapping and Applause?

There has been a saying for many years (by some) that “silence gives consent.” However, that is not always a true statement. Silence may prohibit. When a matter is specified by Scripture, then adding to, substituting, refusing to obey, or changing that specific command would violate the command. For example, the command to “sing” in worship is specific as to the kind of musical praise God requires. “Sing” is a very limited and specific action commanded in Ephesians 5:19 and Colossians 3:16. Silence as to “whistling,” “humming,” “hand-clapping,” “foot-stomping,” and mechanical instruments does not allow those things. It prohibits them.

If we do not follow the New Testament commands, the approved accounts of action in the New Testament, and the clear implications of the inspired writings, just what are we to follow? We are not to be “freewheeling” in matters of the Bible. We need to know the difference between an addition to what is authorized in worship, and an aid in carrying out a command. Many do not understand Bible interpretation. A song book adds nothing to the command to sing or the action of a person singing. The song book is an inanimate object and adds nothing to the action of worshiping in song. It aids in carrying out the command to sing. It adds no new element. A mechanical instrument or hand-clapping adds a new element or a new action that is not authorized. Doing such is not merely an “aid” but an addition, an unauthorized innovation. A blackboard or a Power Point is an “aid” to teaching God’s word, but it is not an unauthorized addition. It does not change or add to the action that is commanded: “to teach.” We are commanded to “sing” not to “play.” We are commanded to “sing” not to clap or applaud.

What about children clapping hands in their “little” songs in Bible class or in pew-packers? Doing so teaches children that it is acceptable. Doing so sets the precedent that it is acceptable behavior. Bible classes for children are the training ground for their behavior for when they become Christians. This should also tell us something about some of the inane, nonsensical songs that are sung by children in their classes and at VBS. If we are to teach spiritual truths to one another in song, that applies to children as well as adults. Singing (for example) “The noble king of York…and when you’re up you’re up…,” and, “If You’re Happy and You Know It, Clap Your Hands,” etc., teaches absolutely nothing of a spiritual nature to children. That kind of nonsense may be why we have reared a generation in the church that “can’t see anything wrong with it,” because they did it growing up! Oh yes, we trained them well! There are many outstanding “children’s songs” that have deep spiritual lessons that children can sing and give glory to God while so-doing. Such songs teach valuable spiritual truths and principles.

Some of the training that young people receive for Christian leadership in worship allows applause (by some) after a Scripture reading, speech, or prayer, when a good performance is done. Some say, “Well, it’s not worship; it’s practice.” One might question the idea that all of it is not worship. But, let’s say (for the moment—for the sake of argument) it is merely “practice” (and not worship). Those who are listening should also learn to “practice” the proper response to scripture reading, prayer, and Bible teaching, etc., that is done in a good way in worship. If we are “practicing” how to worship, then why are we not “practicing” how to participate and respond in worship? The hearers (the auditors) need to learn to do things “decently and in order,” 1 Corinthians 14:40. But, what does applause teach? If they applaud in “practice” will they not think (eventually) that it’s all right to carry applause over into a worship service? That is what is now happening in some places. It also lends itself to the idea that man is the audience and man is to be pleased when, in fact, God is the object of worship and the One observing the actions of His children. He is the One who must be glorified. We are not worshiping to please and entertain ourselves! (John 4:23-24; Acts 12:23; Rom. 16:27; 1 Cor. 10:31). Worship is to be reverent acts paid to a divine being.

Some applaud when one is baptized. A baptism is not entertainment, neither is it an item or act of worship. Some say that since it is not an act of worship, we should be free to applaud a baptism. What a raucous and irritating sound at such a time. A baptism is, indeed, a time of joy and yet it is a very serious matter! It is the most important step that one will take in this life. Do we have to explain the sober, solemn and wonderful nature of this great spiritual step that one takes as his sins are forgiven and he is added into the family of God (Acts 2:47)? If one desires to express joy at a baptism, why not simply give it an “Amen” or sing a song? That is more in line with what the Scriptures teach! Some seem to want so much to bring worldly matters into areas that are distinctly spiritual. Leave the hand-clapping (applause) for a home-run, a touchdown, a concert, and other secular matters. James says, “Is anyone cheerful? Let him sing psalms” (James 5:13). Paul speaks of saying, “Amen,” in the assembly at the giving of thanks, 1 Cor. 14:16. Whatever happened to a brotherly handshake, a pat on the back, or a simple, sincere word of encouragement?

This also applies to applause after a sister speaks at a ladies day, etc. If applause is all right in such a setting, then why do brethren not applaud the teacher of the auditorium Bible class on Sunday morning, or the preacher when he finishes a sermon? (Perhaps they do so in some places). The influence of the entertainment world has crept into the church for which the Son of God gave His life-blood. His spiritual bride was not designed to be a worldly bride (1 John 2:15-17). Come ye out from among them!

What I Need as a Christian, But May Not Know It

  • Frequent association with my brethren.
  • Regular study of God’s word for strength.
  • Regular participation in worship to God.
  • To express my love to God through giving.
  • To pray for my brethren and the church.
  • To give more time in serving the Lord.
  • To go out and do something good for others.
  • To rejoice with those that rejoice and weep with those that weep.
  • To find someone to bring to Christ.

“The Pre-Denominational Church”

One may have noticed the sign in front of the church building at Hartley Bridge Road in Macon, Georgia, that reads, “The Pre-Denominational Church.” This was recently put up temporarily to elicit interest, comments, and questions. But, it also declares a simple truth. The New Testament church—the church that Jesus died to establish (Matt. 16:18)—is the “pre-denominational” church. “Why? What does it mean?” some ask.

The prefix, “pre”, is defined by Webster, “earlier than: prior to: before.” The Lord’s church (Acts 2; Eph. 1:22-23; Col. 1:18; Heb. 12:28; 1 Tim. 3:15; Rom. 16:16) was established in the First Century by Jesus hundreds of years prior to (before; earlier than) the existence of any denomination.

Denominations are the products of the false doctrines of men (Matt. 15:8-9). Jesus did not die for even one denomination to come into existence! Denominationalism was completely unknown in the First Century. When penitent believers obeyed the gospel (Rom. 1:16), Jesus added them to His church (Acts 2:37-47) and to nothing more, nor less! Jesus has only one bride (Eph. 5:23-33), one body (1 Cor. 12:12-13; Col. 1:18), one temple (1 Cor. 3:16-17), and one kingdom (Matt. 16:18-19; Col. 1:13; Rev. 1:9). Jesus has only one church. He said, “Upon this rock I will build my church,” (Matt. 16:18). Notice that he said “church” (singular; only one). He did not plan to build or establish more than one church, and He did not. He built the one that He planned to build.

The phrase “pre-denominational” is not said out of arrogance or self-righteousness, but because it is fact. Are you in the “pre-denominational” church? Are you in the one and only true church of the Lord–the church one may read about in the New Testament? We seek to call people back to the simple Christianity of the New Testament. May we help you to understand more and obey the gospel of Christ?

Modern Sensualists

Many people today think preachers, and others, are silly and over-reacting when they speak against modern dancing. Perhaps they are ignorant of modern dancing, or know fully what it is, and enjoy it! When one speaks against such conduct one speaks against what was done on last Sunday night’s VMA awards by Miley Cyrus and Lady GaGa. One speaks against the same conduct with Beyonce, Britney Spears, Madonna, Katy Perry, and so many others who rely on base, ungodly, lascivious conduct and filthy suggestive words, rather than genuine singing talent to draw crowds and make millions of dollars. The modern dance that puts two people (not married to each other) together in physical contact (so that their bodies touch each other) is part of this same ungodliness. Much sin may result from the unchaste (unholy) handling (touching) of those to whom one is not married. The Scripture says that it is good for a man not to touch a woman, 1 Cor. 7:1. The context is speaking of those who are unmarried to each other. The conduct of two people of the same gender kissing intimately on-stage also falls under this kind of filthy behavior. The indecent bodily movements (gyrations) that replicate, or mimic, sexual conduct is in the same category. The Christian is to abstain from such! God commanded Israel in Leviticus 20:26, “And ye shall be holy unto me: for I the LORD am holy, and have severed you from other people, that ye should be mine.” First Peter 1:14-16, commands, “as obedient children, not conforming yourselves to the former lusts, as in your ignorance; but as He who called you is holy, you also be holy in all your conduct, because it is written, “Be holy, for I am holy.” A holy person does not conduct himself or herself as these sensualists conduct themselves on stage and elsewhere.

Galatians 5:19, 21 speaks of the following works of the flesh: “uncleanness” (akatharsia, moral impurity), “lasciviousness” (aselgeia, wantonness), sexual vice of all kinds; indecent gestures; and “revellings” (any kind of riotous or unseemly conduct; carousals). Lasciviousness is the unchaste handling of males and females; indecent bodily movements, filthy words, as defined by Thayer’s Lexicon. Today’s news showed more than enough of the foregoing conduct by people who were featured on the Video Music Awards (VMA) Sunday night. What was done was disgusting and shameful. No one should have viewed the show. Those who do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God. Romans chapter 1 describes such evil conduct.

Just think of your own daughter or granddaughter doing such things, or being subjected to such behavior by others. What does it say to a boy and how he looks at women and girls when he sees the conduct of Robin Thicke as he behaved Sunday night onstage? Does it lend itself to showing respect to a woman, or is he influenced to demean women and abuse them or use them only as objects of sexual gratification? It is not so pleasant to think about, is it? I did not watch the television program, but saw a clip online, and as a feature on the news on TV. Young folks (and their parents) need to know that some conduct and some entertainers are OFF LIMITS!

We love our children and want only the best for them. We also expect the best from them. We want them to do well in school and in life. We want them to be faithful Christians and good citizens. Let us, as parents and grandparents, be careful what we encourage our young children to do. Let us be careful about what they hear, how we dress them, where we take them, and what we allow them to watch on TV. What may seem to be “cute” or “funny” while they are small will not seem so funny or cute when they are 16 or 17 years old. And, by that time, they may have formed habits that will be hard to break. Help them to be godly.